Ch 4. Scaling & the dimensionless numbers
Overview
Ch. 2 computed five dimensionless numbers from raw physical inputs. Two of them, and , do almost all the work of predicting which of this book’s reduced models applies at a given scale. This chapter turns that observation into a map: place any flow on the plane and read off directly whether it’s unbalanced, baroclinically active, or columnar/barotropic — and see exactly where every earlier chapter’s example flow actually lands.
The model
Notebook: notebooks/ch04_scaling.py → exported to /nb/ch04_scaling.html.
Governing equations use the symbols in notation.
gfdlib.scaling.classify_regime labels every point unbalanced /
QG-baroclinic / QG-barotropic; the notebook renders it as a filled region
map with five reference points from earlier chapters’ example flows placed
directly on it.
Both fluids
- Atmosphere: synoptic weather sits near — not a coincidence, since that is exactly the scale at which baroclinic instability (Ch. 16) most efficiently converts available potential energy into storms.
- Ocean: the wind-driven gyre interior (Ch. 20) sits deep in , but its western boundary current is controlled by friction, a physics this -only map cannot see — a useful reminder that even a good map has a domain of validity.
Exercises
- (analytic) Show algebraically that (both are ratios
built from the same ; note ), so the
map is equivalent to an map — confirm this against
the definitions in
gfdlib.scaling. - (computational) Modify
ch04_scaling.pyto add a sixth reference point for Ch. 12’s internal-wave beams, using that chapter’s typical to estimate an effective (this requires some judgment — internal waves aren’t really a “balanced flow” scale in the same sense as the other five points, which is itself worth noting in your answer). - (exploratory) Sweep the marker along the line from very small
to very large . At what does the marker cross into “unbalanced”?
Does that crossing point depend on where along the line you
started? (It shouldn’t — re-read
classify_regime’s logic to see why the boundary is checked independently of .)
Further reading
Vallis, AOFD 2nd ed., §2.7-2.8 (regime diagrams); Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics 2nd ed., §6.1-6.3; Cushman-Roisin & Beckers, Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, ch. 4-5.