An interactive Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Textbook Notation

Ch 3. Effects of rotation

Overview

Two questions about what rotation alone does to a fluid. Give a parcel a push and remove every other force — what does it do? Not travel in a straight line: it coasts around a circle at the inertial period T=2π/fT=2\pi/f, the signature seen in nearly every filtered current-meter record from the upper ocean. Force a rapidly-rotating, homogeneous fluid at one level only — does the rest of the column notice? It does, rigidly: the Taylor-Proudman theorem says a steady, balanced, homogeneous rotating flow cannot vary along the rotation axis. This chapter derives both exactly, and shows the second is not a separate calculation from Ch. 5’s thermal wind — it is that relation’s zero-buoyancy limit.

The model

Notebook: notebooks/ch03_rotation.py → exported to /nb/ch03_rotation.html. Governing equations use the symbols in notation.

dudt=fv,dvdt=−fu⟹b≡const ⇒ ∂ug∂z=∂vg∂z=0.\frac{du}{dt}=fv,\qquad\frac{dv}{dt}=-fu \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad b\equiv\text{const}\ \Rightarrow\ \frac{\partial u_g}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial v_g}{\partial z}=0.

gfdlib.rotation.inertial_trajectory is the closed-form circular solution of the first equation, cross-checked against an independent gfdlib.timestep.rk4 integration; Part B reuses gfdlib.balance’s exact thermal-wind machinery from Ch. 5 unchanged, sweeping the buoyancy contrast toward zero.

Prefer to run it yourself? Download as a Jupyter notebook — it installs its own dependencies in the first cell. The sliders are static in Jupyter; edit value= and re-run to change a parameter.

Both fluids

Exercises

  1. (analytic) Verify by direct substitution that w(t)=w0e−iftw(t)=w_0e^{-ift} solves dw/dt=−ifwdw/dt=-ifw with w=u+ivw=u+iv, and that integrating once more gives a circle of radius ∣w0∣/f|w_0|/f centered at z0+w0/(if)z_0+w_0/(if) (matching gfdlib.rotation.inertial_trajectory and its test in tests/test_gfdlib.py).
  2. (computational) Modify ch03_rotation.py’s Part B to plot the shear range as a function of LyL_y instead of Δb\Delta b (holding Δb\Delta b fixed) — does narrowing the front also drive the flow toward Taylor-Proudman columnarity, or only Δb→0\Delta b\to0 does?
  3. (exploratory) Using Part A’s sliders, estimate how many inertial periods it would take a storm-excited ocean current (typical f∼10−4 f\sim10^{-4}\,s−1^{-1} at midlatitudes) to complete even a single orbit — convert the nondimensional period on the hodograph panel to hours. Does this match the day-or-so timescale commonly cited for inertial oscillations in oceanographic textbooks?

Further reading

Vallis, AOFD 2nd ed., §2.5-2.6 (inertial oscillations), §4.1-4.2 (Taylor-Proudman); Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics 2nd ed., §2.3-2.5; Cushman-Roisin & Beckers, Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, §7.1-7.3.