Ch 2. Governing equations & the Boussinesq approximation
Overview
The full equations of motion for a rotating, stratified fluid have a dozen terms. At any given scale, most of them are negligible — and this chapter’s entire content is the mechanical procedure for finding out which: nondimensionalize the Boussinesq equations by a length , velocity , and latitude, and the dimensionless coefficient in front of each term answers “does this term matter here?” directly. Every reduced equation set used later in the book (geostrophic balance, quasi-geostrophy, internal waves, Boussinesq convection) is what survives this procedure at that chapter’s particular scale.
The model
Notebook: notebooks/ch02_governing-equations.py → exported to
/nb/ch02_governing-equations.html. Governing equations use the symbols in
notation.
gfdlib.scaling computes and the deformation
radius directly from physical inputs (, latitude) — a
pure calculator, no discretization or time-stepping anywhere.
Both fluids
- Atmosphere: midlatitude synoptic weather sits at (geostrophically balanced); a single convective thunderstorm cell, at km, sits at — genuinely different dynamical regimes governed by the identical Boussinesq equations, distinguished only by scale.
- Ocean: mesoscale eddies sit close to (), which is exactly why they are the scale most efficiently generated by baroclinic instability (Ch. 16) — the regime map in Ch. 4 makes this connection explicit.
Exercises
- (analytic) Starting from the dimensional horizontal momentum equation, substitute and confirm you recover with appearing exactly as the coefficient of the acceleration term.
- (computational) Modify
ch02_governing-equations.pyto add a sixth preset of your choosing (e.g. a hurricane, m/s, km) and read off which terms the calculator says survive. - (exploratory) Using only the sliders, find a combination of where all five numbers are simultaneously — i.e. no single simplification applies. Is this an easy region of parameter space to find, or a narrow one? What does that suggest about how often “the fully general equations, no simplification” is actually the right tool in GFD?
Further reading
Vallis, AOFD 2nd ed., §1.1-1.6 (the Boussinesq approximation), §2.1-2.3 (scaling); Pedlosky, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics 2nd ed., §1.1-1.4, §2.1-2.2; Cushman-Roisin & Beckers, Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, ch. 2-4.